River North Locals Attempt To Work With Bally’s On The Illinois Casino Proposal

Go directly to the content

Written By Matt Boecker on August 5, 2022Last Updated on August 12, 2022
River North Bally's Illinois casino proposal challenged by locals

A couple of months back, Mayor Lori Lightfoot and the committee overseeing the Chicago casino had narrowed down their choices to three options to present to the Illinois Gaming Board (IGB).

I’d like to remind you that there were three options to choose from.

  • Rivers 78 near Chinatown
  • There is a single Central Hard Rock located in the South Loop.
  • Bally’s in River North

A number of residents near the three possible casino locations were unhappy about the idea of having a casino in their community.

The reason they cited:

  1. diminished property value
  2. increased traffic and
  3. Concerns include increased crime.

Bally’s was announced as the chosen contender by the Chicago casino committee in May, possibly becoming the newest Illinois casino. This decision further exacerbated the concerns of River North residents.

River North residents taking a new approach with Bally’s casino

Presently, residents have stopped opposing the likely arrival of Bally’s in the area. However, they are pushing for changes to the construction plans in order to avoid negative impacts on the community.

The group asked Bally’s to replace the outdoor music venue with a public park in order to shield the neighborhood from the noise of loud music on the riverfront.

Brian Israel, president of the River North Residents Association (RNRA), expressed that while he also enjoys concerts, he does not appreciate them being held directly across the street from his home, despite the fact that many people clearly enjoy attending them.

Bally’s officials responded to the RNRA, stating:

Bally’s initially thought the outdoor performance venue would benefit the neighborhood, but now they recognize the valid concerns of local residents about noise, light, and traffic disruptions near their homes. They will consider these concerns and await feedback from other groups.

Nevertheless, the group’s demands extend beyond that. The RNRA has submitted a list of 42 issues to Bally’s.

Key proposal changes to the Bally’s Illinois casino from the RNRA:

  • Take away the suggested bridge leading to Ward Park.
  • Ensure that all vehicles owned by Bally’s, such as maintenance, shuttles, security, and hospitality vehicles, are environmentally friendly and run on renewable fuels.
  • Think about the exit ramps connecting the casino to the Ohio-Ontario feeder.
  • Conduct security patrols in a four-block radius surrounding the permanent and temporary casinos in Chicago.
  • Dedicate 2% of yearly income to support treatment initiatives for individuals struggling with problem gambling.

The RNRA asked for changes to the streets and exit ramps, but Bally’s claimed the expenses would be too high and approval from the Illinois DOT was unlikely.

Bally’s has agreed to collaborate with the Chicago Police Department by increasing patrols in and around both the temporary and permanent casinos.

Bally’s must obtain approval from IGB before beginning construction on the project. Casino officials intend to engage with local organizations prior to finalizing the proposal.